Showing posts with label shoulder charge. Show all posts
Showing posts with label shoulder charge. Show all posts

Monday, 3 December 2012

Safety Hurts



Jovan Belcher playing for the Chiefs

By now I imagine many of you, sports fans or not, have read about Kansas City Chiefs linebacker Jovan Belcher murdering his girlfriend and mother of his child and then driving to his team’s practice facility, before shooting himself in front of his coach and general manager. I cannot pretend to know why he did this and whether or not there was some sort of medical cause, but what I do know is that questions are being asked about whether or not he may have been suffering from any concussion related mental issues.

I am sure we will learn more once an autopsy is performed, but the fact that the question surrounding concussions is being asked legitimately proves in-and-of-itself that any time something bad happens to a current or former player, the question of brain damage is going to come up and deservedly so. We have enough evidence already about the impact concussions have and we also have enough evidence about just how common they are in American football at all levels of the game.

At the same time, the NRL here in Australia has banned the shoulder charge, which when performed correctly makes no contact with the head, however due to how often it goes wrong and head contact is made, the league has acted on it. The response has been near unanimous in disapproval. However, one must wonder if it’s situations like what is happening in the USA that is the actual cause behind the decision taken to ban the shoulder charge. Clearly everyone agrees now that concussions are probably the most serious regular injury suffered in contact sport, but we don’t like when rules are changed based on that fact.

The problem with the rule change though is that there simply isn’t a history in rugby league of brain damage as there is in gridiron. The cases of depression, memory loss, suicide and other problems regularly facing retired NFL players simply isn’t happening here to the same level. Four Corners on the ABC had a story on the impact concussions are having in Australian sport, so clearly there is a precedent for it here too; however it really seems to occur en masse in the USA. Yes we want to cut out concussions, but there isn’t evidence to suggest the shoulder charge specifically is a massive problem causing serious long term issues. After all, most of the research suggests the high impact, memorable concussion incidents that we usually think of aren’t actually the ones causing all the problems, but rather it’s the small, more regular impacts occurring between American football linemen that is the bigger issue.

Now some people may wonder why head injuries are so much more prevalent in the American game where players wear so much padding and helmets and of course are involved in so many fewer plays across the course of a game. Shouldn’t games like rugby or rugby league, which seems so barbaric to many in the USA, be dealing with as many if not more of these problems?

But the answer is no and I think I know why.

It’s the helmets themselves. American football players feel protected due to their padding and helmets and are trained to use them as weapons. Obviously recent rule changes are trying to crack down on this, but it still happens all the time and the players are killing themselves by doing it. It’s counter-intuitive.

I genuinely believe that if you had American football played without the pads and with only rugby headgear or even the old leather helmets the NFL players wore 100 years ago, you would see a drastic change instantly. Yes it would change the game itself quite a lot. Player’s instincts are currently a certain way and they would have to very quickly have to adjust, but I think it would happen a lot quicker than it is right now, where they change the rules to punish guys for doing what they have been taught to do since childhood.

I would love to see a one-off game of American football played in this manner. I can’t imagine it ever happening and if anything I feel like they will bring in more protection with new and improved technology. But honestly, they might just be doing more harm than good.

What is certain is that the game is changing and will continue to change as they try and solve this problem. The question really is though, what is causing the problem?

Friday, 23 November 2012

Friday Footy Quick Hits


New ARLC CEO David Smith if you wanted to know what he looked like

Even though it’s off season there are some things I want to comment on going on in the world of footy.

First of all the ARLC just announced their new CEO in Lloyds International boss David Smith. Smith is from Wales and has no background in sports administration but is more a traditional business executive type. It remains to be seen how he does in the job, but this hiring says to me that in terms of actual football issues, the ARLC board itself will be the ones making the big calls and Smith will focus on the business side of things. The biggest issue of the new TV deal has already been dealt with, but I can’t imagine Smith is going to be the guy deciding on issues like the shoulder charge.

Speaking of the shoulder charge, the decision to ban it has been greeted with near unanimous disappointment and disagreement. Whilst as a fan I agree with the players, fans and media who are upset we are losing one of the most entertaining aspects of the game, I also have been following all the research coming out of the USA on the real impact of concussions. The NRL are choosing to make a decision now, before they start dealing with the issues the NFL faces of players having serious brain damage after their careers. I don’t like it, but I do get it and so I’m not going to hate on the decision like most. I might have more of an issue with it once referees and the judiciary start their near-certain inconsistency policing and punishing it.

Another issue that I’m commenting on simply because I feel like it’s not in the news enough is the situation at the Tigers. Everything I hear suggests that the Tigers development is not going to get approved and once that happens the Tigers are going to be in serious, serious trouble. Like “goodbye Tigers” level trouble. By 2014 I think we are actually likely to see the Tigers part of the joint venture fold and welcome back the Western Suburbs Magpies, who are just waiting to take over the licence the way Manly did when the Bears folded. It’s not even impossible that this could occur before the start of next season, depending on how quickly we get an answer on the development. How is this not a bigger story already?

Finally, with $onny Bill Williams now officially a Rooster, at least for a season, and with Quade Cooper quitting rugby, wouldn’t surprise me to see the Roosters do everything in their power to bring Cooper across to Bondi Junction. Given the money he will command however, they might end up paying about a third of their salary cap to just two players. Risky business for two guys who aren’t exactly durable or reliable as humans. If he doesn’t end up there, he might replace Thurston in Townsville if JT skips town.