It’s a Man’s World

Lauren Jackson competing at the 2012 Olympics

I read a headline today that turned out to be about something entirely different, however it got me thinking. The story was about how dual football and cricket international Ellyse Perry will have to choose between playing for Sydney FC in football or NSW in cricket this week when their matches clash. However the headline to get you to click on the story related to how Perry wants to compete against men. I’m sure she has mentioned this in the past, but it was nowhere to be found in the story itself.

Nonetheless, the issue of women competing in male sports fascinates me. Women’s sports obviously have rules preventing men from competing in them; however many male sports do not expressly have such rules preventing women. For the most part it is an issue that has never come up and obviously the woman competing in the male sport would not be at an unfair advantage as a man would if he tried to enter the women’s game.

I admit that it’s hard for me to have the perspective and insight on this topic that a woman would have and I would love to get the opinion of as many women as possible in the comments, but I will do my best to share my thoughts on an issue that I think will come up more and more in the future.

The sports in which it is easiest for a female to compete against men are obviously those where technically the sport is individual rather than in direct physical competition. Women compete against men in equestrian and horse racing all the time and recently we have seen women, such as Annika Sorenstam, get invited to compete in some golf tournaments, but they have yet to truly be competitive at that level due to the different tees and course set up.

Danica Patrick has become a famous example, but is not the only female to compete in motorsport against men and she has now moved on from Indy Car to NASCAR where she is certainly competitive. Again these are examples of sports that are technically individually based even if they are driving on the track at the same time.

Outside of the famous Billie Jean King exhibition match against an already retired Bobby Riggs, we haven’t really seen the top female competitors compete against men in direct competition sports, at least not in modern times.

I think that if we are to see women competing against men directly in the future it will have to start in a sport such as tennis, following on from Billie Jean’s lead and where they already compete in mixed doubles. For years people have speculated about whether Serena and Venus Williams would be competitive on the men’s circuit and whilst none of us can claim to know with certainty how they would do, our suspicions cannot be answered unless we get to see it.

But is it in their interests to try?

Women’s tennis, unlike most sports, actually has great earning potential simply by staying on the women’s tour. The prize money in tournaments along with the sponsorship money available means that it is not financially in their interests to compete against men, when it is reasonable to expect that even if competitive, they wouldn’t advance as far as they could against women.

Not only that, but should they try and fail miserably, it would potentially be damaging to their careers even if it shouldn’t be. The speculation as to whether they could compete is potentially better than trying and answering the question in the negative.

But what if they tried and succeeded? Say Serena Williams entered the men’s draw for the 2013 US Open and made it to the 3^rd round before losing to a seeded opponent. Would that not be one of the most amazing and inspiring events in sports history, not to mention move Serena to another stratosphere in terms of success and sponsorship dollars?

Some would argue that allowing her entry as a marketing play is taking away a spot from a man who can’t then turn around and go take her spot against the women. But if she is deserving of the spot and is truly one of the best 128 players in the World, regardless of gender, I think she deserves the opportunity. In a sense, without giving the opportunity to find out, we can’t know whether someone actually deserved the opportunity in the first place.

That’s just tennis though, which is a one on one sport without physical contact. What if a woman were to try to compete against men in a sport with physical contact?

I can’t see a day where women compete against men in actual contact sports like rugby but what about a non-contact sport like basketball?

Basketball is technically a non-contact sport (by rule), but is certainly very physical. I would never suggest a woman would be able to compete at the NBA level, but what about if Lauren Jackson or Liz Cambage tried to play in the NBL here in Australia? First of all it would be an amazing story and much needed publicity for the league, whilst giving the opportunity to a woman to earn more than they can in the women’s game. Obviously it would require a player considered tall in the women’s game as they would only be considered mid-sized in the men’s game, so someone like Jackson makes sense.

But could she do it and acquit herself well? I honestly believe she could be a decent bench player as a shooting guard in the men’s game, at least on offence, if given the chance. However, I have serious doubts about whether a woman would be able to defend in the men’s game, as opposing teams would look to target and take advantage of the athleticism gap. A 6’5” man who is used to being a perimeter player would likely blow past a 6’5” female used to being a centre. But I’d love to see Jackson or Cambage or even Baylor University star Brittney Griner, give it a shot.

Cricket is another sport where I think seeing a woman attempt to compete would be fascinating and have a shot at succeeding. The only real issue is whether or not the pace of the fast bowling would simply be too much. If Ellyse Perry or any other female cricketer aspired to play in the men’s game, as long as they could handle the much faster bowling, then I don’t see why they couldn’t make it work. To make it happen I’d imagine they would first need to try and play in a club level match before maybe having a go in the Ryobi Cup.

Again, I doubt the female competitor would reach the level of making the Australian Men’s team, much like I doubt a female basketballer would compete in the NBA, but if they were capable of competing in the domestic competition and earning the money and success that came along with that, then I am all for it. That being said, my doubts are simply my own personal doubts and without the opportunity, we will never know. A female spin bowler could show up and be as good as Shane Warne and end up being an all-time great regardless of gender.

Women’s sports are never going to generate as much revenue as the men do and so the earning potential for females is always going to be lower in sport (tennis excluded); however should one woman in any particular sport be so good that they could have the opportunity to compete against the men and earn the money the men earn, then they should be allowed to.

If nothing else, they would be an inspiration to the next generation of women, whether they were trying to follow in their athletic footsteps or simply entering a career where men still make disproportionate incomes compared to their female colleagues.